Feature Detail

Competency Tracking with Proof

Measure mastery across institutional competencies with transparent evidence. The CTA-driven pipeline links scores to reasoning steps, rubric criteria, and student quotes.

Request a demo See all features
Competency mastery dashboard

Mastery at a glance

Monitor cohort mastery, pass, and reassess levels in one view.

Evidence-linked scores

Trace every rating to a quote and rubric dimension.

Actionable gaps

Identify specific competencies that require targeted support.

How it works

Rubric-based scoring evaluates performance by dimension.
Heuristic extraction captures decision strategies.
Competency mapping translates scores to institutional frameworks.
Evidence linking preserves traceability and confidence.

Evidence-centered design

Competency views surface rationale, confidence, and quotes so instructors can verify why a student reached each level.

Evidence chain

Evidence is traceable end-to-end, but the chain depends on the assessment type: chat-based assessments include rubric dimension → quote → conversation, while heuristic-based scans link competency → heuristic → quote → conversation.

Competency-based education

Aligns learning outcomes to demonstrable mastery, not seat time.

Validation-ready

Confidence and rationale support accreditation and assessment review.

Competency evidence modal

Where you see it

Cohort Health mastery chart for cohort-level insight.
Student 360 for individual competency breakdowns.
Evidence Modal for quotes and rationale.
Student assessment report

Inside the product

Assessment reports summarize competency outcomes with evidence.
Dimension breakdowns show which rubric criteria drove the score.
CTA pipeline links reasoning to measurable competencies.

Signals and artifacts

Rubric dimensions

Structured criteria define what mastery looks like.

Heuristics evidence

Decision strategies become the proof behind competency ratings.

Confidence & rationale

Scores include confidence and explanations for transparency.

FAQ

What frameworks are supported?

Competencies can map to institutional frameworks and program-specific outcomes.

How is evidence validated?

Evidence traces back to quotes and rubric criteria for audit-ready review.

Does this replace instructor judgment?

No. It augments instructor review with consistent, transparent evidence.

Outcomes

Defensible results for accreditation and reporting.
Targeted interventions based on competency gaps.
Continuous improvement informed by evidence.

Scope & limits

Accuracy depends on rubric quality and assessment coverage. Mapping can be tuned per institution.

×